Skip to main content

Table 3 Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for NASA-TLX total scores

From: Test-retest reliability and validity of vagally-mediated heart rate variability to monitor internal training load in older adults: a within-subjects (repeated-measures) randomized study

NASA-TLX total score

Experimental Phase 1

Experimental Phase 2

Descriptivesa

Main Effect for Time

Main Effect for Level

Descriptivesa

Main Effect for Time

Main Effect for Level

mean ± SD or median (IQR)

Fb

pc

 

Fd

pe

post-hoc tests

mean ± SD or median (IQR)

Fb

pc

 

Fd

pe

post-hoc tests

Game: Simple

 

0.3

0.601

n =43

130.5

< 0.001

comparison:

p-value:

effect size:

 

3.1

0.079

n =35

51.5

< 0.001

comparison:

p-value:

effect size:

 Level 1

9.5 (19.0)

     

Level 1 vs. 2

< 0.001

0.909

37.5 (29.0)

     

Level 1 vs. 2

< 0.001

0.823

 Level 2

16.0 (24.0)

     

Level 1 vs. 3

< 0.001

1.187

44.5 (35.0)

     

Level 1 vs. 3

< 0.001

1.164

 Level 3

27.5 (26.5)

     

Level 2 vs. 3

< 0.001

1.133

57.5 (33.5)

     

Level 2 vs. 3

< 0.001

1.006

Game: Targets

 

10.3

0.001

n =42

132.0

< 0.001

comparison:

p-value:

effect size:

 

6.3

0.012

n =34

89.4

< 0.001

comparison:

p-value:

effect size:

 Level 1

12.0 (21.0)

     

Level 1 vs. 2

< 0.001

1.168

30.0 (26.5)

     

Level 1 vs. 2

< 0.001

1.128

 Level 2

29.0 (26.3)

     

Level 1 vs. 3

< 0.001

1.227

48.5 (28.5)

     

Level 1 vs. 3

< 0.001

1.229

 Level 3

45.0 (31.8)

     

Level 2 vs. 3

< 0.001

1.194

64.0 (30.5)

     

Level 2 vs. 3

< 0.001

1.174

Game: Tetris

 

4.9

0.028

n =42

76.8

< 0.001

comparison:

p-value:

effect size:

 

16.3

< 0.001

n =34

56.0

< 0.001

comparison:

p-value:

effect size:

 Level 1

19.0 (23.5)

     

Level 1 vs. 2

< 0.001

0.906

33.0 (29.3)

     

Level 1 vs. 2

< 0.001

0.994

 Level 2

28.5 (40.3)

     

Level 1 vs. 3

< 0.001

1.189

45.0 (33.5)

     

Level 1 vs. 3

< 0.001

1.163

 Level 3

58.5 (49.5)

     

Level 2 vs. 3

< 0.001

1.181

60.5 (32.3)

     

Level 2 vs. 3

< 0.001

0.917

Game: Simon

 

9.2

0.002

n =41

132.0

< 0.001

comparison:

p-value:

effect size:

 

12.2

< 0.001

n =33

68.4

< 0.001

comparison:

p-value:

effect size:

 Level 1

15.0 (25.0)

     

Level 1 vs. 2

< 0.001

1.151

44.0 (36.0)

     

Level 1 vs. 2

< 0.001

0.910

 Level 2

32.0 (32.5)

     

Level 1 vs. 3

< 0.001

1.227

52.0 (35.8)

     

Level 1 vs. 3

< 0.001

1.201

 Level 3

60.0 (41.3)

     

Level 2 vs. 3

< 0.001

1.201

70.0 (32.5)

     

Level 2 vs. 3

< 0.001

1.162

Game: Habitats

 

0.0

0.936

n =42

4.9

0.013

comparison:

p-value:

effect size:

 

8.0

0.005

n =35

12.8

< 0.001

comparison:

p-value:

effect size:

 Level 1

13.0 (25.0)

     

Level 1 vs. 2

< 0.001

0.513

31.0 (34.5)

     

Level 1 vs. 2

0.058

0.320

 Level 2

16.5 (28.0)

     

Level 1 vs. 3

< 0.001

0.515

32.0 (37.0)

     

Level 1 vs. 3

< 0.001

0.813

 Level 3

16.0 (31.3)

     

Level 2 vs. 3

0.218

0.190

36.5 (31.0)

     

Level 2 vs. 3

0.003

0.491

  1. Presented are descriptive statistics, F-values, and p-values of the test and the retest data in Experimental Phase 1 and 2, respectively
  2. Abbreviations: HF Absolute power of the high-frequency (0.15–0.4 Hz; HF) band, HFnu Relative power of HF (in normal units), IQR Interquartile range, mRR Mean R-R time interval, n Sample size, NASA-TLX NASA task load index, RMSSD Root mean square of successive RR interval differences, SD1 Poincaré plot standard deviation perpendicular to the line of identity, SD Standard deviation
  3. aDescriptive statistics data is reported as mean ± standard deviation for data fulfilling all the assumptions that would subsequently justify parametric statistical analyses and median (interquartile range) for data violating these assumptions
  4. bF-value for the main effect of timepoint (test- vs. retest-measurement) from the two-way repeated measures ANOVA
  5. cP-value for the main effect of timepoint (test- vs. retest-measurement) from the two-way repeated measures ANOVA
  6. dF-value for the main effect of game level (Level 1 = easy, Level 2 = challenging, Level 3 = excessive) from the two-way repeated measures ANOVA
  7. eP-value for the main effect of game level (Level 1 = easy, Level 2 = challenging, Level 3 = excessive) from the two-way repeated measures ANOVA