Table 2 Overview of included publication details
From: Does mental fatigue affect performance in racket sports? A systematic review
Study | Population characteristics | Intervention | Outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Manipulation | Duration | Markers | Type of Sports | Performance Domain | Performance outcomes | ||
Mansec et al., 2018 | 22 elites Sex: 22 ♂ Age: 26.9 ± 8.9 y | EG: AX-CPT CG: Watching movie | 90 min | SE: F-VAS↑ PBM: RPE↑ | Table tennis | Skill: Stroke | Ball speed↓; Accuracy↔ Faults↑; Total Score↓ |
Van Cutsem et al., 2019 | 11 experienced Sex: 5 ♂; 6 ♀ Age: 25 ± 4 y | EG: Stroop task CG: Documentary | 90 min | SE: F-VAS↑; NASA-TLX: MD↑; PD↑;TD↑; Effort↑; Frustration↑; PBM: I-MO↔;S-MO↔ PM: HR↔;BG↔ | Badminton | Perceptual-cognitive: Cognitive; Visuomotor | Flanker task Response time↑ Accuracy↔ Visuomotor task Response time↑ |
Kosack et al., 2020 | 19 elite Sex: 19 ♂ Age: 20 ± 2.8 y | EG: Stroop task CG: Documentary | 60 min | SE: F-VAS↑; PBM: MO↔; Focus↔; RPE↔; PM: HR↔; BL↔ | Badminton | Perceptual-cognitive: Physical; Specific skill | Countermovement jump height↔ Badminton-Specific duration↔ |
Habay et al., 2021 | 11 experienced Sex: 7♂; 4♀ Age: 24 ± 2 y | EG: Stroop task CG: Documentary | 60 min | SE: F-VAS↑; NASA-TLX: Frustration↑ PBM: I-MO↓; S-MO↔; PRE↑ PM: HR↔ EEG upper α band↓;θ band↓; | Table tennis | Perceptual-cognitive: Cognitive; Visuomotor | Flanker task Response time↔; Accuracy↔; Visuomotor task; Reaction time↑; |
DÃaz-GarcÃa et al., 2023 | 61 amateurs Age: 28.71 ± 7.68 y | EG: Stroop task CG: Control condition | 30 min | SE: F-VAS↑; PM: Saccade latencies↓ | Padel | Perceptual-cognitive: Cognitive; | Psychomotor vigilance task Reaction time↑ |
Filipas et al., 2023 | 10 professionals Sex: 10♂ Age: 18 ± 4 y | EG: Stroop task CG: Cognitive task | 30 min | SE: F-VAS↑; | Tennis | Skill: Serve | First serve accuracy↔; Second serve accuracy↓; First serve speed↔; Second serve speed↔ |