Acute responses to a potentiation warm-up protocol on sprint and change of direction in female football players: a randomized controlled study

Table 2 Comparison between pre- and post-protocol performance in the 40-m sprint test and the pre-planned COD t-test for EXPG and CONG

Test	Groups	Pre-Protocol (s)	Post- Protocol (s)	Change (s)	∆ (%)	p-value			ES
Test	Groups	Pre-Protocol (s)	Post- Protocol (s)	Change (s)	∆ (%)	Time	G×T	Group	Time η_p²
Pre-planned COD t-test	EXPG	8.95 ± 0.27	9.22 ± 0.24	0.27 ± 0.26	2.93	0.094	0.258	0.555	0.176
Pre-planned COD t-test	CONG	8.97 ± 0.52	9.03 ± 0.31	0.06 ± 0.48	0.66	0.094	0.258	0.555	0.176
40-m sprint test	EXPG	6.17 ± 0.24	6.22 ± 0.25	0.05 ± 0.08	0.80	0.057	0.548	0.253	0.251
40-m sprint test	CONG	6.02 ± 0.12	6.11 ± 0.17	0.09 ± 0.18	1.47	0.057	0.548	0.253	0.251

Note: Statistical analysis of mixed repeated measures ANOVA 2(group) × 2(time). Values presented as mean ± SD; p - significance value of the mixed repeated measures ANOVA test; η_p² – partial eta squared; CONG - Control group; EXPG - Experimental intervention group; G×T – interaction between group and time; ES – effect size

ISSN: 2052-1847