Skip to main content

Table 3 Characteristics of studies included

From: The arch myth: investigating the impact of flat foot on vertical jump height: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

Subject characteristics

Group

Paticipants

Participant type

Age (years)

Height (cm)

Weight (kg)

Measurement

Jump type

Jump height(cm)

With or without arm

Footwear

Fu et al.(2016) [45]

Flat foot

10

Amateur

24.71 ± 4.32

173.25 ± 2.22

64.10 ± 3.58

CAI

SJ

41 ± 23

NR

Without

Normal foot

10

25.24 ± 3.31

172.50 ± 2.88

65.13 ± 4.66

40 ± 15

Sagat et al.(2023) [46]

Flat foot

101

Amateur

13.6 ± 0.6

168.9 ± 9.6

62.7 ± 15.7

CA

CMJ

33.9 ± 8.1

Without

NR

Normal foot

107

13.0 ± 0.6

167.8 ± 9.1

59.1 ± 14.4

33.7 ± 6.4

Moharkar et al.(2023) [47]

Flat foot

130

Basketball player

18–25

NR

NR

NDT

CMJ

20.23 ± 3.11

With

With

Normal foot

20 ± 2.8

Contarli et al.(2022) [48]

Flat foot

28

Gymnast

12.28 ± 4.30

145 ± 18.2

39.96 ± 16.77

CA

SJ

26.95 ± 2.87

Without

Without

Normal foot

16

12.81 ± 4.53

146 ± 16.9

40.06 ± 16.69

29.35 ± 8.3

Tudor et al.(2009) [49]

Flat foot

93

Amateur

13.07 ± 1.24

NR

NR

SI

CMJ

33.74 ± 5

Without

NR

Normal foot

34.8 ± 6.21

Yunus et al.(2020) [50]

Flat foot

53

Amateur

21.84 ± 1.66

157.16 ± 6.99

55.47 ± 14.05

NDT

CMJ

27.63 ± 5.62

With

NR

Normal foot

29.29 ± 6.7

Arévalo-Mora et al.(2016) [51]

Flat foot

37

Amateur

11.22 ± 0.82

NR

NR

HAI

CMJ

25.46 ± 6.09

With

NR

Normal foot

96

11.03 ± 0.85

NR

NR

26.08 ± 4.07

Twomey et al.(2006) [52]

Flat foot

27

Amateur

10.01 ± 0.59

139.8 ± 7.86

36.74 ± 7.07

NR

CMJ

33.6 ± 6.5

With

Without

Normal foot

27

29.9 ± 6.7

Åžahan et al.(2023) [53]

Flat foot

39

Amateur

22 ± 2

165 ± 7.5

58 ± 12.25

NDT

SJ

23 ± 6

Without

NR

Normal foot

41

21 ± 2.25

164 ± 5

59 ± 9.75

25 ± 5.75

  1. NR: Not report; Cavanagh Arch Index: CAI; Clarke Angle: CA; Navicular Drop Test: NDT; Staheli Index: SI; Harris Arch Index: HAI