Skip to main content

Table 4 Means and standard deviations of muscle activity during the loading phase [% maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC)] when running in PF group compared with WPF group (with and without FO)

From: Effect of double- density foot orthoses on ground reaction forces and lower limb muscle activities during running in adults with and without pronated feet

Muscles

WPF group

PF group

Main effect of group (eta squared)

Main effect of condition (eta squared)

Group-by-condition interaction (eta squared)

Pre

Post

∆%

95%CI

Pre

Post

∆%

95%CI

TA

105.35 ± 31.29

61.35 ± 18.08

-41.76

21.79, 66.21

148.61 ± 38.37

109.91 ± 36.2

-26.04

8.56, 68.84

< 0.001 (1.953)*

0.001 (2.163)*

0.754 (0.142)

Gas-M

105.77 ± 44.60

60.84 ± 11.26

-42.47

16.84, 73.02

193.86 ± 58.20

94.63 ± 23.47

-51.18

52.16, 146.30

< 0.001 (2.496)*

< 0.001 (2.599)*

0.036 (0.978)*

VL

99.53 ± 39.85

41.83 ± 8.53

-57.97

19.41, 34.72

147.17 ± 34.44

68.8 ± 19.83

-53.25

46.89, 117.69

< 0.001 (1.964)*

0.001 (3.483)*

0.238 (0.532)

VM

74.33 ± 13.32

47.26 ± 8.07

-36.41

31.52, 83.87

153.78 ± 45.73

71.49 ± 20.04

-53.51

51.24, 105.51

< 0.001 (3.092)*

< 0.001 (3.055)*

0.002 (1.543)*

RF

84.22 ± 35.09

38.22 ± 7.51

-54.61

23.36, 68.62

127.26 ± 27.44

61.26 ± 17.18

-51.86

44.02, 87.98

< 0.001 (2.016)*

< 0.001 (3.419)*

0.177 (0.610)

BF

76.47 ± 36.03

35.08 ± 6.64

-54.12

15.03, 60.21

122.26 ± 19.04

59.93 ± 17.92

-50.98

44.51, 91.01

< 0.001 (2.615)*

< 0.001 (3.137)*

0.052 (0.899)

ST

72.18 ± 35.52

34.56 ± 6.16

-52.11

18.29, 64.50

124.07 ± 21.98

56.31 ± 16.99

-54.61

41.63, 83.02

< 0.001 (2.444)*

0.001(3.207)*

0.153 (0.648)

Glut-M

72.53 ± 35.76

32.47 ± 5.54

-55.23

17.56, 62.57

122.87 ± 21.31

54.65 ± 16.13

-55.52

45.85, 90.57

< 0.001 (2.571)*

0.001 (3.289)*

0.063 (0.857)

  1. Notes: WPF, without pronatd feet; PF, pronated feet; TA, tibialis anterior; Gas-M, gastrocnemius medialis; BF, biceps femoris; ST, semitendinosus; VL, vastus lateralis; VM, vastus medialis; RF, rectus femoris; Glut-M, gluteus medius; 95% CI, confidence interval refers to the confidence interval of the difference between with and without FO. Significant results were denoted in bold