Skip to main content

Table 1 shows the demographic data of the included patients. SD; standard deviation, NA; non-available, BMI; body mass index

From: The effectiveness of mulligan mobilization with movement (MWM) on outcomes of patients with ankle sprain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study ID

Country

Study design

Sample size

Age; years mean (SD)

Males

Females

BMI, mean (SD)

Mulligan

Placebo

Mulligan

Placebo

Mulligan

Placebo

Mulligan

Placebo

Mulligan

Placebo

Collins 2004

Australia

Double-blinded RCT (cross-over)

16

16

28.25 ± 9.3

28.25 ± 9.3

8

8

8

8

NA

NA

Gogate 2020

India

Randomized controlled trial

16

16

26.1 ± 6.6

28.4 ± 7.0

9

10

7

6

NA

NA

Nguyen 2021

Belgium

Pragmatic &RCT

21

22

22.6 ± 3.7

22.1 ± 2.12

8

8

13

14

NA

NA

Norouzi 2021

Iran

Double blinded RCT

20

20

29.12 ± 7.50

33.29 ± 5.75

10

8

6

9

26.12 ± 3.7

27.00 ± 3.5

Phong Nguyen 2020

Belgium

RCT

25

24

23 ± 2.5

21.7 ± 1.74

19

17

6

7

NA

NA

Simsek 2018

Turkey

RCT (cross over)

26

26

28.9 ± 5.7

28.9 ± 5.7

16

16

10

10

21.6 ± 1.2

21.6 ± 1.2

Alves 2018

Portugal

Randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial

16

16

21.5 ± 2.8

21.5 ± 2.8

10

10

6

6

24.1 ± 2.6

24.1 ± 2.6

Cruz-Diaz 2014

Spain

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

30

31

26.83 ± 4.62

29.55 ± 9.44

17

17

13

14

23.57 ± 2.88

23.19 ± 2.15

Reid 2007

Canada

Randomized controlled crossover trial

23

23

25 ± 9

25 ± 9

8

8

15

15

NA

NA

Shadegani 2023

Iran

Randomized, single blind crossover trial

16

16

29.37 ± 6.08

29.37 ± 6.08

5

5

11

11

NA

NA